Politics
Another suit seeking David Mark, Aregbesola’s sack as ADC leaders for judgment April 13
The Judge fixed the date on Friday after Abejide’s counsel, Ibrahim Idris, SAN, and lawyers to the defence adopted their processes and presented their arguments for and against the suit.
Abejide, a member of the House of Representatives on the platform of the ADC, had instituted the suit through his lawyer.
In the originating summons, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1637/2025 filed on February. 15, 2026 by Idris, the lawmaker sued ADC, Ralph Nwosu, Mark, Aregbesola and Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as 1st to 5th defendants respectively.
Nwosu was the former national chairman of ADC who stepped down for Mark, the former Senate President to take over the leadership of the party.
Abejide among the eight reliefs, sought an order nullifying Nwosu’s handover or transfer of ADC’s leadership to Mark and Aregbesola as interim national Chairman and intenm national Secretary respectively on July 2, 2025, at Shehu Musa Yar’adua Centre, Abuja for being illegal, unlawful, null and void.
He sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining Mark and Aregbesola from parading themselves as leaders of the party “as thelr purported appointment, selection or election was unlawful, illegal, null and void.”
He also sought perpetual injunction, restraining INEC from recognising Mark and Aregbesola as ADC’s interim national chairman and interim national secretary “as their appomtment. selection or election did not meet the requirements of Section 82 of the Electoral Act, 2022,” among other prayers.
But ADC, represented by Shaibu Aruwa, SAN; Nwosu, represented by P. I. Oyewole; Rilwan Okpanachi who appeared for Mark; Aregbesola’s lawyer, I. R. Abdullahi, and counsel who appeared for INEC, Anthony Onyeri, all prayed the court to dismiss the suit for lacking in merit.
ADC, Nwosu, Mark and Aregbesola, in their arguments, submitted that Abejide lacked the legal right to institute the suit.
In their separate preliminary objections, they argued that the subject matter of the suit borders on the internal affairs of a political party which is non-justiciable.
They added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to delve into such matters.
The defendants also stated that contrary to Abejide’s submission, the Mark-led leadership was elected on July 29, 2025, at the National Executive Committee meeting of the party, and not July 2, 2025.
They stated that Abejide had not demonstrated any reasonable cause why the suit should be filed.
The defendants, who urged the court to dismiss the suit with subtantial cost in line with Section 83(5) of the Electiral Act, 2026, argued that the matter is academic.
Also in his argument, A. O. Onyeri, who appeared for INEC, prayed the court to dimiss the suit.
Comments
Post a Comment